Open Access Article Economics Financial Management

ESG and Administrative Costs in Equity Trading: Evidence from China

Authors

Lanchun Huang(1), Zhan Wang(2)

  1. Interdisciplinary Studies College, Payap University
  2. Research Center of Finance, Shanghai Business School, Shanghai

https://doi.org/10.36923/iefrontiers.v27i2.271

Abstract

Recent findings suggest that firms with higher Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) scores may experience lower stock returns, contrary to the common belief that better ESG performance enhances market reputation and stock returns. This study aims to investigate the relationship between ESG performance, management costs, and stock returns by introducing an "ESG-cost framework." The framework proposes that the costs incurred in implementing ESG practices can reduce revenue, offsetting the positive effects of strong ESG performance. Using an empirical analysis of firms based on both their ESG scores and management costs, the study finds that firms with low management costs gain the most from high ESG scores, while those with high costs may see diminished stock returns despite strong ESG performance. Additionally, the study proposes trading strategies that integrate ESG scores and cost considerations, demonstrating that these strategies yield better returns than traditional market indices. These findings offer a new perspective on ESG decision-making and provide valuable insights for constructing effective trading strategies.

Article information

Section
Articles
Submitted
August 22, 2024
Published
October 20, 2024
Corresponding author
Zhan Wang
Check for updates
Check for updates

How to Cite

Huang, L., & Wang, Z. (2024). ESG and Administrative Costs in Equity Trading: Evidence from China. Innovation Economics Frontiers, 27(2), 98-109. https://doi.org/10.36923/iefrontiers.v27i2.271

References

  1. Artikis, P. G., Diamantopoulou, L., Papanastasopoulos, G. A., & Sorros, J. N. (2022). Asset growth and stock returns in European equity markets: Implications of investment and accounting distortions. Journal of Corporate Finance, 73, 102193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2022.102193 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  2. Aswani, J., Raghunandan, A., & Rajgopal, S. (2024). Are carbon emissions associated with stock returns? Review of Finance, 28(1), 75-106. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfad013 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  3. Avramov, D., Cheng, S., Lioui, A., & Tarelli, A. (2022). Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty. Journal of Financial Economics, 145(2), 642-664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.09.009 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  4. Bansal, M., Ali, A., & Choudhary, B. (2021). Real earnings management and stock returns: Moderating role of cross-sectional effects. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 6(3), 266-280. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-11-2020-0107 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  5. Bekaert, G., & Popov, A. (2019). On the link between the volatility and skewness of growth. IMF Economic Review, 67(4), 746-790. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41308-019-00092-2 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  6. Biasin, M., Delle Foglie, A., & Giacomini, E. (2024). Addressing climate challenges through ESG-real estate investment strategies: An asset allocation perspective. Finance Research Letters, 63, 105381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105381 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  7. Bolton, P., & Kacperczyk, M. (2021). Do investors care about carbon risk? Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 517-549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.008 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  8. Briec, W., Kerstens, K., & Jokung, O. (2007). Mean-variance-skewness portfolio performance gauging: A general shortage function and dual approach. Management Science, 53(1), 135-149. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0596 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  9. Broadstock, D., Chan, K., Cheng, L., & Wang, X. (2021). The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 in China. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101716 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  10. Cox, J. C., & Ross, S. A. (1976). The valuation of options for alternative stochastic processes. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(1-2), 145-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90023-4 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  11. DasGupta, R. (2022). Financial performance shortfall, ESG controversies, and ESG performance: Evidence from firms around the world. Finance Research Letters, 46, 102487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102487 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  12. De Spiegeleer, J., Höcht, S., Jakubowski, D., Reyners, S., & Schoutens, W. (2023). ESG: A new dimension in portfolio allocation. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 13(2), 827-867. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1923336 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  13. Fafaliou, I., Giaka, M., Konstantios, D., & Polemis, M. (2022). Firms' ESG reputational risk and market longevity: A firm-level analysis for the United States. Journal of Business Research, 149, 161-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.010 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  14. Grima, D. M., Renzi-Riccia, G., & Madambaa, A. (2022). Asset allocation with non-pecuniary ESG preferences: Efficiently blending value with values. Journal of Investment Management. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4176634 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  15. Harvey, C. R., Liechty, J. C., Liechty, M. W., & Muller, P. (2010). Portfolio selection with higher moments. Quantitative Finance, 10(5), 469-485. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697681003756877 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  16. Hong, H., & Kacperczyk, M. (2009). The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(1), 15-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.09.001 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  17. Lai, T. Y. (1991). Portfolio selection with skewness: A multiple-objective approach. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 1(3), 293. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02408382 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  18. Li, H., Zhang, X., & Zhao, Y. (2022). ESG and firm's default risk. Finance Research Letters, 47, 102713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102713 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  19. Lioui, A., & Tarelli, A. (2022). Chasing the ESG factor. Journal of Banking and Finance, 139, 106498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2022.106498 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  20. Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1952.tb01525.x Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  21. Merton, R. C. (1976). Option pricing when underlying stock returns are discontinuous. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(1-2), 125-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90022-2 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  22. Naveed, M., Sohail, M. K., Abdin, S. Z., Awais, M., & Batool, N. (2020). Role of ESG disclosure in determining asset allocation decisions: An individual investor perspective. Paradigms, 14(1), 157-165. Google Scholar WorldCat
  23. Pedersen, L., Fitzgibbons, S., & Pomorski, L. (2021). Responsible investing: The ESG-efficient frontier. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 572-597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.11.001 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  24. Penman, S., & Zhang, X. J. (2020). A theoretical analysis connecting conservative accounting to the cost of capital. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 69(1), 101236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2019.101236 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  25. Wang, S., & Xia, Y. (2012). Portfolio selection and asset pricing. Springer, Berlin, Germany. Google Scholar WorldCat
  26. Zhang, X., Zhao, X., & Qu, L. (2021). Do green policies catalyze green investment? Evidence from ESG investing developments in China. Economics Letters, 207, 110028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2021.110028 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat

Similar Articles

1-10 of 19

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.