ESG and Administrative Costs in Equity Trading: Evidence from China
Article Sidebar
-
ESG Performance, ESG-Cost Framework, Administrative Costs, Return Prediction, Portfolio Stock Selection, Corporate Governance, Sustainable Investing
Abstract
Recent findings suggest that firms with higher Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) scores may experience lower stock returns, contrary to the common belief that better ESG performance enhances market reputation and stock returns. This study aims to investigate the relationship between ESG performance, management costs, and stock returns by introducing an "ESG-cost framework." The framework proposes that the costs incurred in implementing ESG practices can reduce revenue, offsetting the positive effects of strong ESG performance. Using an empirical analysis of firms based on both their ESG scores and management costs, the study finds that firms with low management costs gain the most from high ESG scores, while those with high costs may see diminished stock returns despite strong ESG performance. Additionally, the study proposes trading strategies that integrate ESG scores and cost considerations, demonstrating that these strategies yield better returns than traditional market indices. These findings offer a new perspective on ESG decision-making and provide valuable insights for constructing effective trading strategies.
Full text article
References
Artikis, P. G., Diamantopoulou, L., Papanastasopoulos, G. A., & Sorros, J. N. (2022). Asset growth and stock returns in European equity markets: Implications of investment and accounting distortions. Journal of Corporate Finance, 73, 102193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2022.102193
Aswani, J., Raghunandan, A., & Rajgopal, S. (2024). Are carbon emissions associated with stock returns? Review of Finance, 28(1), 75-106. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfad013
Avramov, D., Cheng, S., Lioui, A., & Tarelli, A. (2022). Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty. Journal of Financial Economics, 145(2), 642-664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.09.009
Bansal, M., Ali, A., & Choudhary, B. (2021). Real earnings management and stock returns: Moderating role of cross-sectional effects. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 6(3), 266-280. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-11-2020-0107
Bekaert, G., & Popov, A. (2019). On the link between the volatility and skewness of growth. IMF Economic Review, 67(4), 746-790. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41308-019-00092-2
Biasin, M., Delle Foglie, A., & Giacomini, E. (2024). Addressing climate challenges through ESG-real estate investment strategies: An asset allocation perspective. Finance Research Letters, 63, 105381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105381
Bolton, P., & Kacperczyk, M. (2021). Do investors care about carbon risk? Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 517-549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.008
Briec, W., Kerstens, K., & Jokung, O. (2007). Mean-variance-skewness portfolio performance gauging: A general shortage function and dual approach. Management Science, 53(1), 135-149. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0596
Broadstock, D., Chan, K., Cheng, L., & Wang, X. (2021). The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 in China. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101716
Cox, J. C., & Ross, S. A. (1976). The valuation of options for alternative stochastic processes. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(1-2), 145-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90023-4
DasGupta, R. (2022). Financial performance shortfall, ESG controversies, and ESG performance: Evidence from firms around the world. Finance Research Letters, 46, 102487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102487
De Spiegeleer, J., Höcht, S., Jakubowski, D., Reyners, S., & Schoutens, W. (2023). ESG: A new dimension in portfolio allocation. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 13(2), 827-867. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1923336
Fafaliou, I., Giaka, M., Konstantios, D., & Polemis, M. (2022). Firms' ESG reputational risk and market longevity: A firm-level analysis for the United States. Journal of Business Research, 149, 161-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.010
Grima, D. M., Renzi-Riccia, G., & Madambaa, A. (2022). Asset allocation with non-pecuniary ESG preferences: Efficiently blending value with values. Journal of Investment Management. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4176634
Harvey, C. R., Liechty, J. C., Liechty, M. W., & Muller, P. (2010). Portfolio selection with higher moments. Quantitative Finance, 10(5), 469-485. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697681003756877
Hong, H., & Kacperczyk, M. (2009). The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(1), 15-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.09.001
Lai, T. Y. (1991). Portfolio selection with skewness: A multiple-objective approach. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 1(3), 293. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02408382
Li, H., Zhang, X., & Zhao, Y. (2022). ESG and firm's default risk. Finance Research Letters, 47, 102713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102713
Lioui, A., & Tarelli, A. (2022). Chasing the ESG factor. Journal of Banking and Finance, 139, 106498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2022.106498
Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1952.tb01525.x
Merton, R. C. (1976). Option pricing when underlying stock returns are discontinuous. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(1-2), 125-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90022-2
Naveed, M., Sohail, M. K., Abdin, S. Z., Awais, M., & Batool, N. (2020). Role of ESG disclosure in determining asset allocation decisions: An individual investor perspective. Paradigms, 14(1), 157-165.
Pedersen, L., Fitzgibbons, S., & Pomorski, L. (2021). Responsible investing: The ESG-efficient frontier. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 572-597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.11.001
Penman, S., & Zhang, X. J. (2020). A theoretical analysis connecting conservative accounting to the cost of capital. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 69(1), 101236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2019.101236
Wang, S., & Xia, Y. (2012). Portfolio selection and asset pricing. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
Zhang, X., Zhao, X., & Qu, L. (2021). Do green policies catalyze green investment? Evidence from ESG investing developments in China. Economics Letters, 207, 110028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2021.110028
Authors
Lanchun Huang
Huang Lanchun, Professor, member of the expert pool for the Chinese Ministry of Education. The main research field is social problem analysis in China. The author has published more than 20 research articles and won more than 5 research awards.
Zhan Wang
Zhan Wang, Ph.D. Assistant professor in finance. The main research fields are risk management, asset pricing, and green finance. The author has published more than 10 research papers in high-quality journals, which include the Journal of Financial Research, Financial Research Letter, and Economic Modelling.
Copyright (c) 2024 Lanchun Huang, Zhan Wang

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright / Open Access Policy: This journal provides immediate free open access and is distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). This is an open-access journal, which means readers can access it freely. Readers may read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles for any lawful purpose without seeking prior permission from the publisher or author. This is consistent with the Budapest Open Access Initiative's (BOAI) definition of open access.