Open Access Article Digital Economy

Impact of Urban Digital Economy on ESG Performance: Do Technological and Business Model Innovation Matter

Authors

Shuhua Zhang(1)

  1. Interdisciplinary Studies College, Payap University,

https://doi.org/10.36923/iefrontiers.v28i1.278

Download PDF

Abstract

The rapid development of the digital economy is a critical national strategy for the Chinese government, with the establishment of digital economy platforms as a key component. Simultaneously, both the government and enterprises have embraced the concept of sustainable development. Since corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance serves as a crucial micro-indicator of sustainability, it is essential to investigate whether the digital economy platforms developed by the Chinese government can enhance the ESG performance of relevant companies. This paper first examines the impact of urban digital economy platform construction on corporate awareness of ecological and environmental protection, social responsibility, and governance practices. It then proposes two primary mechanisms—technological innovation and business model innovation. Finally, empirical evidence is presented based on a sample of 107 urban CSI 300-listed companies in China, using data from 2015 to 2019. The analysis yields three key findings: (1) the construction of urban digital economy platforms significantly improves the ESG performance of companies in the region; (2) the impact on the social subindex is not significant, but the effect is more pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises, the manufacturing sector, and the eastern region; and (3) business model innovation plays a more significant role in driving ESG performance compared to technological innovation. This study contributes to the understanding of how digital economy platforms influence corporate ESG performance.

Article information

Keywords
Digital economy platformBusiness model innovationcorporate ESG performanceData of listed companies in China
Section
Articles
Issue
Vol. 28 No. 1 (2025)
Submitted
October 7, 2024
Published
November 27, 2024
Corresponding author
Shuhua Zhang
Check for updates
Check for updates

How to Cite

Zhang, S. (2024). Impact of Urban Digital Economy on ESG Performance: Do Technological and Business Model Innovation Matter. Innovation Economics Frontiers, 28(1), 14-30. https://doi.org/10.36923/iefrontiers.v28i1.278

References

  1. Alsayegh, M. F., Abdul Rahman, R., & Homayoun, S. (2020). Corporate economic, environmental, and social sustainability performance transformation through ESG disclosure. Sustainability, 12, 3910. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093910 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  2. Brown, L. (1981). Building a sustainable society. W.W. Norton & Company. Google Scholar WorldCat
  3. Broadstock, D., Chan, K., Cheng, L., & Wang, X. (2021). The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 in China. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101716 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  4. Cai, X., Zhu, B., Zhang, H., & others. (2020). Can direct environmental regulation promote green technology innovation in heavily polluting industries? Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Science of The Total Environment, 746, 140810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140810 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  5. Chen, G., Han, J., & Yuan, H. (2022). Urban digital economy development, enterprise innovation, and ESG performance in China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 955055. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.955055 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  6. Fatimah, Y. A., Kannan, D., Govindan, K., & others. (2023). Circular economy e-business model portfolio development for e-business applications: Impacts on ESG and sustainability performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 415, 137528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137528 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  7. Feng, J., Goodell, J. W., & Shen, D. (2022). ESG rating and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 46, 102476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102476 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  8. Goldfarb, A., & Tucker, C. (2019). Digital economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 57(1), 3-43. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20171452 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  9. Goldfarb, A., Greenstein, S., & Tucker, C. (Eds.). (2015). Economic analysis of the digital economy. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226206981.001.0001 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  10. Gompers, P. A., Mukharlyamov, V., Weisburst, E., & others. (2022). Gender gaps in venture capital performance. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 57(2), 485-513. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109020000988 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  11. Guo, F., Wang, J., Wang, F., Kong, T., Zhang, X., & Cheng, Z. (2020). Measuring China's digital financial inclusion: Index compilation and spatial characteristics. China Economic Quarterly, 19(4), 1401-1418. [In Chinese] Google Scholar WorldCat
  12. Habib, A. M. (2022). Does the efficiency of working capital management and environmental, social, and governance performance affect a firm's value? Evidence from the United States. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 6(3), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.21272/fmir.6(3).18-25.2022 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  13. Habib, A. M. (2023). Do business strategies and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance mitigate the likelihood of financial distress? A multiple mediation model. Heliyon, e17847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17847 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  14. Habib, A. M. (2024). Does real earnings management affect a firm's environmental, social, and governance (ESG), financial performance, and total value? A moderated mediation analysis. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26, 28239-28268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03809-6 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  15. Habib, A. M., & Mourad, N. (2024). The influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices on US firms' performance: Evidence from the coronavirus crisis. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15, 2549-2570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01278-w Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  16. Habib, A. M., Yang, G., & Cui, Y. (2024). Do competitive strategies affect working capital management efficiency? Business Process Management Journal, 30(5), 1716-1736. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-12-2023-0953 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  17. Hughes, A., Urban, M. A., & Wójcik, D. (2021). Alternative ESG ratings: How technological innovation is reshaping sustainable investment. Sustainability, 13, 3551. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063551 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  18. Jun, X., Ai, J., Zheng, L., & others. (2024). Impact of information technology and industrial development on corporate ESG practices: Evidence from a pilot program in China. Economic Modelling, 139, 106806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2024.106806 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  19. Kim, B., Barua, A., & Whinston, A. B. (2002). Virtual field experiments for a digital economy: A new research methodology for exploring an information economy. Decision Support Systems, 32(3), 215-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(01)00094-X Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  20. Liu, K., & Ma, F. (2024). The impact of the digital economy on environmental pollution: A perspective on collaborative governance between government and public. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12, 1435714. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1435714 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  21. Liu, X., Li, H. Y., & Kong, X. (2022). Research on the impact of party organization governance on corporate ESG performance. Finance and Economics Series, (1), 100-112. [In Chinese] Google Scholar WorldCat
  22. Liu, J., Yang, Y., & Zhang, S. (2020). Research on the measurement and driving factors of China's digital economy. Shanghai Journal of Economics, (6), 81-96. Google Scholar WorldCat
  23. Li, Y., Zhao, Y., Ye, C., & others. (2024). ESG ratings and the cost of equity capital in China. Energy Economics, 136, 107685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107685 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  24. MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84-99. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  25. Mo, Z., Liu, Y., Lu, C., & others. (2023). Influences of industrial internet platform firms' ESG performance and digital leadership on user firms' innovation performance: The mediating role of inter-firm trust. Journal of Digital Economy, 2, 204-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdec.2024.01.002 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  26. Naffa, H., & Fain, M. (2021). A factor approach to the performance of ESG leaders and laggards. Finance Research Letters, 102073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102073 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  27. Osterwalder, A. (2005). Clarifying business models: Origins, present, and future of the concept. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.01601 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  28. Pan, W., He, Z., & Pan, H. (2021). Research on spatiotemporal evolution and distribution dynamics of digital economy development in China. China Soft Science, (10), 137-147. [In Chinese] Google Scholar WorldCat
  29. Pan, W., Xie, T., Wang, Z., & Ma, L. (2022). Digital economy: An innovation driver for total factor productivity. Journal of Business Research, 139, 303-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.061 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  30. Priyadarshi, N. (2022). Technologies empowered environmental, social, and governance (ESG): An industry 4.0 landscape. Sustainability, 15, 309. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010309 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  31. Schumpeter, J. A. (1939). Business cycles: A theoretical, historical, and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar WorldCat
  32. Takahashi, H., & Yamada, K. (2021). When the Japanese stock market meets COVID-19: Impact of ownership, China and US exposure, and ESG channels. International Review of Financial Analysis, 101670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101670 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  33. Tapscott, D. (1996). The digital economy. McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar WorldCat
  34. Tang, H. (2022). The effect of ESG performance on corporate innovation in China: The mediating role of financial constraints and agency cost. Sustainability, 14, 3769. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073769 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  35. Wei, W., Zhu, W., & Lin, G. (2020). Approaching business models from an economic perspective II. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50315-8 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  36. Yu, T. H., & Huarng, K. H. (2020). A new event study method to forecast stock returns: The case of Facebook. Journal of Business Research, 115, 317-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.006 Google Scholar Crossref WorldCat
  37. Zhang, J., Fu, K., & Liu, B. R. (2022). Can the digital economy promote the low-carbon transformation of cities from the perspective of dual objective constraint? Modern Finance and Economics-Journal of Tianjin University of Finance and Economics, (8), 3-23. [In Chinese] Google Scholar WorldCat

Similar Articles

1-10 of 19

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.