Impact of Urban Digital Economy on ESG Performance: Do Technological and Business Model Innovation Matter
Article Sidebar
-
Digital economy platform, Business model innovation, corporate ESG performance, Data of listed companies in China
Abstract
The rapid development of the digital economy is a critical national strategy for the Chinese government, with the establishment of digital economy platforms as a key component. Simultaneously, both the government and enterprises have embraced the concept of sustainable development. Since corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance serves as a crucial micro-indicator of sustainability, it is essential to investigate whether the digital economy platforms developed by the Chinese government can enhance the ESG performance of relevant companies. This paper first examines the impact of urban digital economy platform construction on corporate awareness of ecological and environmental protection, social responsibility, and governance practices. It then proposes two primary mechanisms—technological innovation and business model innovation. Finally, empirical evidence is presented based on a sample of 107 urban CSI 300-listed companies in China, using data from 2015 to 2019. The analysis yields three key findings: (1) the construction of urban digital economy platforms significantly improves the ESG performance of companies in the region; (2) the impact on the social subindex is not significant, but the effect is more pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises, the manufacturing sector, and the eastern region; and (3) business model innovation plays a more significant role in driving ESG performance compared to technological innovation. This study contributes to the understanding of how digital economy platforms influence corporate ESG performance.
Full text article
References
Alsayegh, M. F., Abdul Rahman, R., & Homayoun, S. (2020). Corporate economic, environmental, and social sustainability performance transformation through ESG disclosure. Sustainability, 12, 3910. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093910
Brown, L. (1981). Building a sustainable society. W.W. Norton & Company.
Broadstock, D., Chan, K., Cheng, L., & Wang, X. (2021). The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 in China. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101716
Cai, X., Zhu, B., Zhang, H., & others. (2020). Can direct environmental regulation promote green technology innovation in heavily polluting industries? Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Science of The Total Environment, 746, 140810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140810
Chen, G., Han, J., & Yuan, H. (2022). Urban digital economy development, enterprise innovation, and ESG performance in China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 955055. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.955055
Fatimah, Y. A., Kannan, D., Govindan, K., & others. (2023). Circular economy e-business model portfolio development for e-business applications: Impacts on ESG and sustainability performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 415, 137528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137528
Feng, J., Goodell, J. W., & Shen, D. (2022). ESG rating and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 46, 102476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102476
Goldfarb, A., & Tucker, C. (2019). Digital economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 57(1), 3-43. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20171452
Goldfarb, A., Greenstein, S., & Tucker, C. (Eds.). (2015). Economic analysis of the digital economy. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226206981.001.0001
Gompers, P. A., Mukharlyamov, V., Weisburst, E., & others. (2022). Gender gaps in venture capital performance. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 57(2), 485-513. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109020000988
Guo, F., Wang, J., Wang, F., Kong, T., Zhang, X., & Cheng, Z. (2020). Measuring China's digital financial inclusion: Index compilation and spatial characteristics. China Economic Quarterly, 19(4), 1401-1418. [In Chinese]
Habib, A. M. (2022). Does the efficiency of working capital management and environmental, social, and governance performance affect a firm's value? Evidence from the United States. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 6(3), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.21272/fmir.6(3).18-25.2022
Habib, A. M. (2023). Do business strategies and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance mitigate the likelihood of financial distress? A multiple mediation model. Heliyon, e17847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17847
Habib, A. M. (2024). Does real earnings management affect a firm's environmental, social, and governance (ESG), financial performance, and total value? A moderated mediation analysis. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26, 28239-28268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03809-6
Habib, A. M., & Mourad, N. (2024). The influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices on US firms' performance: Evidence from the coronavirus crisis. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15, 2549-2570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01278-w
Habib, A. M., Yang, G., & Cui, Y. (2024). Do competitive strategies affect working capital management efficiency? Business Process Management Journal, 30(5), 1716-1736. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-12-2023-0953
Hughes, A., Urban, M. A., & Wójcik, D. (2021). Alternative ESG ratings: How technological innovation is reshaping sustainable investment. Sustainability, 13, 3551. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063551
Jun, X., Ai, J., Zheng, L., & others. (2024). Impact of information technology and industrial development on corporate ESG practices: Evidence from a pilot program in China. Economic Modelling, 139, 106806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2024.106806
Kim, B., Barua, A., & Whinston, A. B. (2002). Virtual field experiments for a digital economy: A new research methodology for exploring an information economy. Decision Support Systems, 32(3), 215-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(01)00094-X
Liu, K., & Ma, F. (2024). The impact of the digital economy on environmental pollution: A perspective on collaborative governance between government and public. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12, 1435714. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1435714
Liu, X., Li, H. Y., & Kong, X. (2022). Research on the impact of party organization governance on corporate ESG performance. Finance and Economics Series, (1), 100-112. [In Chinese]
Liu, J., Yang, Y., & Zhang, S. (2020). Research on the measurement and driving factors of China's digital economy. Shanghai Journal of Economics, (6), 81-96.
Li, Y., Zhao, Y., Ye, C., & others. (2024). ESG ratings and the cost of equity capital in China. Energy Economics, 136, 107685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107685
MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84-99. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84
Mo, Z., Liu, Y., Lu, C., & others. (2023). Influences of industrial internet platform firms' ESG performance and digital leadership on user firms' innovation performance: The mediating role of inter-firm trust. Journal of Digital Economy, 2, 204-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdec.2024.01.002
Naffa, H., & Fain, M. (2021). A factor approach to the performance of ESG leaders and laggards. Finance Research Letters, 102073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102073
Osterwalder, A. (2005). Clarifying business models: Origins, present, and future of the concept. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.01601
Pan, W., He, Z., & Pan, H. (2021). Research on spatiotemporal evolution and distribution dynamics of digital economy development in China. China Soft Science, (10), 137-147. [In Chinese]
Pan, W., Xie, T., Wang, Z., & Ma, L. (2022). Digital economy: An innovation driver for total factor productivity. Journal of Business Research, 139, 303-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.061
Priyadarshi, N. (2022). Technologies empowered environmental, social, and governance (ESG): An industry 4.0 landscape. Sustainability, 15, 309. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010309
Schumpeter, J. A. (1939). Business cycles: A theoretical, historical, and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. McGraw-Hill.
Takahashi, H., & Yamada, K. (2021). When the Japanese stock market meets COVID-19: Impact of ownership, China and US exposure, and ESG channels. International Review of Financial Analysis, 101670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101670
Tapscott, D. (1996). The digital economy. McGraw-Hill.
Tang, H. (2022). The effect of ESG performance on corporate innovation in China: The mediating role of financial constraints and agency cost. Sustainability, 14, 3769. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073769
Wei, W., Zhu, W., & Lin, G. (2020). Approaching business models from an economic perspective II. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50315-8
Yu, T. H., & Huarng, K. H. (2020). A new event study method to forecast stock returns: The case of Facebook. Journal of Business Research, 115, 317-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.006
Zhang, J., Fu, K., & Liu, B. R. (2022). Can the digital economy promote the low-carbon transformation of cities from the perspective of dual objective constraint? Modern Finance and Economics-Journal of Tianjin University of Finance and Economics, (8), 3-23. [In Chinese]
Authors
Copyright (c) 2024 Shuhua Zhang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright / Open Access Policy: This journal provides immediate free open access and is distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). This is an open-access journal, which means readers can access it freely. Readers may read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles for any lawful purpose without seeking prior permission from the publisher or author. This is consistent with the Budapest Open Access Initiative's (BOAI) definition of open access.