Open Access Article

Does Democracy Come at a Fiscal Cost? Revisiting the Political Business Cycles in Pakistan

Authors

Niaz Ali(1) Niaz Ali Corresponding author Affiliation PhD Scholar, Department of Economics, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan Email addressniazali371@gmail.com Other articles by this author , Muhammad Tariq(2) Muhammad Tariq Affiliation Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan Other articles by this author , Muhammad Azam Khan(3) Muhammad Azam Khan Affiliation Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan Other articles by this author

  1. PhD Scholar, Department of Economics, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan
  2. Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan
  3. Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan

https://doi.org/10.36923/jcmi.v6i2.663

Abstract

The role of electoral incentives on public spending patterns is particularly relevant in developing nations such as Pakistan as it has direct bearing on the issue of fiscal discipline and quality of governance. This study examines the role of electoral cycles on sectoral budgetary allocations at provincial level in Pakistan. Based on panel data of four provinces covering the years 1972-2018, the study uses a Fixed Effects (FE) model to determine dynamic variations in budgetary patterns. These findings are quite solid in favor of the Political Business Cycle (PBC) hypothesis with the results showing that government spending rises by a large margin (23 percentage points of GDP) in election years. It also shows that population development and openness to trade have impact of high magnitude that is positive when it comes to government expenditure, and unemployment level has no significant impact. The evidence shows a greater requirement of fiscal policies and institutional limits so as to put down opportunistic expenditure of the incumbent governments. Pakistan ought to think about institutionalizing long-term rules-based budgetary plans at provinces level to curb discretional expenditure during elections. Opportunistic fiscal expansions could be hindered by legal provisions making statutory budget ceilings obligatory before elections. Lastly, adopting practices of participatory budgeting on a local government level would increase citizen involvement and responsibility, which would minimize the room on fruitlessly spending money based on political interests

Article information

Section
Articles
Submitted
October 21, 2025
Accepted
November 21, 2025
Published
December 2, 2025
Corresponding author
Niaz Ali
Check for updates
Check for updates

References

  1. Aidt, T. S., Veiga, F. J., & Veiga, L. G. (2011). Election results and opportunistic policies: A new test of the rational political business cycle model. Public Choice, 148(1–2), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9644-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9644-3 Google Scholar PubMed Crossref WorldCat
  2. Akhmedov, A., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2004). Opportunistic political cycles: Test in a young democracy setting. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(4), 1301–1338. https://doi.org/10.1162/0033553042476206 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/0033553042476206 Google Scholar PubMed Crossref WorldCat
  3. Alesina, A. (1988). Macroeconomics and politics. In S. Fischer (Ed.), NBER macroeconomics annual 1988 (Vol. 3, pp. 13–52). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1086/654070 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/654070 Google Scholar PubMed Crossref WorldCat
  4. Alesina, A., & Ardagna, S. (2010). Large changes in fiscal policy: Taxes versus spending. Tax Policy and the Economy, 24(1), 35–68. https://doi.org/10.1086/649828 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/649828 Google Scholar PubMed Crossref WorldCat
  5. Ali, I. (2004). Historical impacts on political economy in Pakistan. Asian Journal of Management Cases, 1(2), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/097282010400100203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/097282010400100203 Google Scholar PubMed Crossref WorldCat
  6. Ali, S. (2024). Understanding the nature of political economy in developing states: A study of the structural issues in the political economy of Pakistan. Journal of Development and Social Sciences, 5(2), 648–659. https://doi.org/10.47205/jdss.2024(5-II)60 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47205/jdss.2024(5-II)60 Google Scholar PubMed Crossref WorldCat
  7. Bergman, U. M., Hutchison, M. M., & Jensen, S. E. H. (2016). Promoting sustainable public finances in the European Union: The role of fiscal rules and government efficiency. European Journal of Political Economy, 44, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2016.04.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2016.04.005 Google Scholar PubMed Crossref WorldCat
  8. Brender, A., & Drazen, A. (2005). Political budget cycles in new versus established democracies. Journal of Monetary Economics, 52(7), 1271–1295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2005.04.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2005.04.004 Google Scholar PubMed Crossref WorldCat
  9. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. Harper & Brothers. Google Scholar PubMed WorldCat
  10. Dubois, E. (2016). Political business cycles 40 years after Nordhaus. Public Choice, 166(1–2), 235–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-016-0313-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-016-0313-z Google Scholar PubMed Crossref WorldCat
  11. Ebeke, C., & Ölcer, D. (2013). Fiscal policy over the election cycle in low-income countries (IMF Working Paper No. 13/153). International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781475588514.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781475588514.001 Google Scholar PubMed Crossref WorldCat
  12. Election Commission of Pakistan. (n.d.). Election Commission of Pakistan. https://ecp.gov.pk/ Google Scholar PubMed WorldCat
  13. Enkelmann, S., & Leibrecht, M. (2013). Political expenditure cycles and election outcomes: Evidence from disaggregation of public expenditures by economic functions. Economics Letters, 121(1), 128–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2013.07.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2013.07.015 Google Scholar PubMed Crossref WorldCat
  14. Hibbs, D. A., Jr. (1977). Political parties and macroeconomic policy. The American Political Science Review, 71(4), 1467–1487. https://doi.org/10.2307/1961490 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1961490 Google Scholar PubMed Crossref WorldCat
  15. Johnson, J. W. (2025). The fiscal politics of turnover and tenure: Partisan competition and interterm cycles. Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy, 6(1), 105–134. https://doi.org/10.1561/113.00000119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1561/113.00000119 Google Scholar PubMed Crossref WorldCat
  16. Kalecki, M. (1943). Political aspects of full employment. The Political Quarterly, 14(4), 322–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.1943.tb01016.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.1943.tb01016.x Google Scholar PubMed Crossref WorldCat
  17. Khemani, S. (2004). Political cycles in a developing economy: Effect of elections in the Indian states. Journal of Development Economics, 73(1), 125–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2003.01.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2003.01.002 Google Scholar PubMed Crossref WorldCat
  18. Ministry of Finance, Finance Division. (n.d.). Finance Division, Government of Pakistan. https://www.finance.gov.pk/ Google Scholar PubMed WorldCat
  19. Nordhaus, W. D. (1975). The political business cycle. The Review of Economic Studies, 42(2), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296528 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2296528 Google Scholar PubMed Crossref WorldCat
  20. Pakistan Bureau of Statistics. (n.d.). Pakistan Bureau of Statistics. https://www.pbs.gov.pk/ Google Scholar PubMed WorldCat
  21. Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2000). Political economics: Explaining economic policy. MIT Press. Google Scholar PubMed WorldCat
  22. Quaicoe, S. (2022). Estimating the modulating role of economic development on the effect of elections on government expenditure in Africa. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1), 2022273. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2021.2022273 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2021.2022273 Google Scholar PubMed Crossref WorldCat
  23. Rodrik, D. (1998). Why do more open economies have bigger governments? Journal of Political Economy, 106(5), 997–1032. https://doi.org/10.1086/250038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/250038 Google Scholar PubMed Crossref WorldCat
  24. Rogoff, K., & Sibert, A. (1988). Elections and macroeconomic policy cycles. The Review of Economic Studies, 55(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297526 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2297526 Google Scholar PubMed Crossref WorldCat
  25. Shi, M., & Svensson, J. (2006). Political budget cycles: Do they differ across countries and why? Journal of Public Economics, 90(8–9), 1367–1389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.09.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.09.009 Google Scholar PubMed Crossref WorldCat
  26. Sieg, G., & Batool, I. (2012). Pakistan, politics and political business cycles. The Pakistan Development Review, 51(2), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.30541/v51i2pp.153-166 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30541/v51i2pp.153-166 Google Scholar PubMed Crossref WorldCat
  27. Tufte, E. R. (1978). Political control of the economy. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691219417 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691219417 Google Scholar PubMed Crossref WorldCat
  28. Wacziarg, R., & Welch, K. H. (2008). Trade liberalization and growth: New evidence. The World Bank Economic Review, 22(2), 187–231. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhn007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhn007 Google Scholar PubMed Crossref WorldCat
  29. World Bank. (n.d.). World development indicators [Data set]. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators Google Scholar PubMed WorldCat
  30. Zaidi, S. A. (2015). Issues in Pakistan's economy: A political economy perspective (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. Google Scholar PubMed WorldCat