Sustainability as a Living Process: Learning, Leadership and Continuous Improvement in Swedish Organisations

Anette Oxenswärdh (1)
1. Department of Civil and Industrial Engineering, Quality Science, Uppsala University, Visby, Sweden

Abstract

Sustainability is increasingly recognised as a strategic and operational priority, yet many organisations struggle to translate sustainability ambitions into coherent practice. Swedish organisations, operating within a trust-based and participatory context, offer valuable insights into how sustainability processes evolve across sectors. This study explores how sustainability processes are structured, implemented, and led within Swedish organisations. It examines how sustainability develops from strategic intent to everyday practice and identifies the leadership and learning mechanisms that support progress from compliance toward transformation. A qualitative multiple-case study of 30 organisations across public, private, and non-profit sectors was conducted. Data were collected through document analysis, interviews, and process mapping, and were analysed thematically to identify patterns in process maturity, leadership, and organisational learning. Three maturity stages emerged: reactive, integrative, and transformative. While most organisations had moved beyond basic compliance, few achieved systemic integration. Ecological initiatives were generally the strongest, whereas social and economic dimensions remained underdeveloped. Participatory and trust-based leadership was associated with higher maturity, deeper learning, and shared responsibility. Conversely, fragmented systems and diffuse accountability hindered sustainability progress. The study proposes the Continuous Sustainable Improvement (CSI) model, linking quality management with regenerative learning to conceptualise sustainability as an ongoing organisational process. Practitioner-based cases provided authentic insights but limited longitudinal assessment. The findings reframe sustainability as a continuous, learning-oriented practice rather than a compliance exercise. Organisations should integrate sustainability into core systems, balance structural discipline with cultural engagement, and utilise feedback mechanisms and cross-sector partnerships to support innovation. This approach strengthens trust, inclusivity, and collective responsibility, enhancing both organisational capability and social resilience.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Alvesson, M. (2011). Interpreting interviews. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446268353 Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat

Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2017). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research(3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. Google Scholar | WorldCat

Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method, and practice. Addison-Wesley. Google Scholar | WorldCat

Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410617095 Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat

Baumgartner, R. J., & Ebner, D. (2010). Corporate sustainability strategies: Sustainability profiles and maturity levels. Sustainable Development, 18(2), 76–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.447 Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat

Benn, S., Edwards, M., & Williams, T. (2014). Organizational change for corporate sustainability (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315819181 Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat

Broman, G. I., & Robèrt, K.-H. (2017). A framework for strategic sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.121 Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat

Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row. Google Scholar | WorldCat

Capra, F., & Luisi, P. L. (2014). The systems view of life: A unifying vision. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511895555 Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat

Coghlan, D., & Brannick, T. (2014). Doing action research in your own organization (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529682861 Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat

Dahlgaard-Park, S. M., & Dahlgaard, J. J. (2019). Excellence 4.0: Learning, quality management and sustainability in the fourth industrial revolution. Routledge. Google Scholar | WorldCat

Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. MIT Press. Google Scholar | WorldCat

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101 Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat

Doppelt, B. (2017). Leading change toward sustainability: A change-management guide for business, government and civil society (2nd ed.). Greenleaf Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351278966 Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat

Dyllick, T., & Muff, K. (2016). Clarifying the meaning of sustainable business: Introducing a typology from business-as-usual to true business sustainability. Organization & Environment, 29(2), 156–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615575176 Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat

Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.3310080106 Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat

European Union. (2022, December 16). Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU, as regards corporate sustainability reporting (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive). Official Journal of the European Union, L 322, 15–63. Google Scholar | WorldCat

Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., & Rockström, J. (2010). Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability, and transformability. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03610-150420 Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat

Global Reporting Initiative. (2021). GRI standards: Universal standards 2021. Google Scholar | WorldCat

Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Paulist Press. Google Scholar | WorldCat

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. Google Scholar | WorldCat

Horlings, L. G., Lundholm, C., & Buclet, N. (2020). Place-based leadership for sustainability: Lessons from Swedish frontrunners. Sustainability, 12(12), Article 5299. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125299 Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat

Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2017). The experiential educator: Principles and practices of experiential learning. Experience-Based Learning Systems, Inc. Google Scholar | WorldCat

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall. Google Scholar | WorldCat

Laloux, F. (2014). Reinventing organizations: A guide to creating organizations inspired by the next stage of human consciousness. Nelson Parker. Google Scholar | WorldCat

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8 Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat

Lozano, R. (2015). A holistic perspective on corporate sustainability drivers. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1325 Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat

Maak, T., & Pless, N. M. (2006). Responsible leadership in a stakeholder society: A relational perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9047-z Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat

Mang, P., & Reed, B. (2020). Regenerative development and design: A framework for evolving sustainability. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0684-1_303 Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat

Meadows, D. (2008). Thinking in systems: A primer. Chelsea Green Publishing. Google Scholar | WorldCat

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2022). OECD environmental performance review: Sweden 2022. OECD Publishing. Google Scholar | WorldCat

Oxenswärdh, A. (2011). Responsibility Relations in School Development (Ansvarsförhållanden vid skolutveckling).” Doctoral thesis, Stockholm University. Google Scholar | WorldCat

Oxenswärdh, A. (2020). Sustainability practice at hotels on the island of Gotland in Sweden: An exploratory study. European Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Recreation, 10(3), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.2478/ejthr-2020-0018 Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat

Oxenswärdh, A. (2020). Micro business entrepreneurs and bricoleurs on their way towards sustainable practice: Implications for learning processes. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 11(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.2478/dcse-2020-0001 Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat

Oxenswärdh, A., & Persson-Fischier, U. (2020). Mapping master students' processes of problem solving and learning in groups in sustainability education. Sustainability, 12(13), Article 5299. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135299 Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat

Oxenswärdh, A. (2023). Small tourist entrepreneurs on their pathway towards sustainable practice. In M. Cöster, S. Gebert Persson, & O. Ronström (Eds.), Enabling sustainable visit (pp. 203–221). eddy.se ab. Google Scholar | WorldCat

Oxenswärdh, A. (2024). Sustainable Frontrunners and Pathfinders—What Can Be Learnt from Their Practices? J Sustain Res. 6(2):e240024. https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20240024 Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. Google Scholar | WorldCat

Pless, N. M., & Maak, T. (2011). Responsible leadership: Pathways to the future. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1114-4 Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat

Pruzan, P. (1998). From control to values-based management: Ethical tools for a learning organization. Copenhagen Business School Press. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006079110633 Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat

Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2008). The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607934 Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat

Revans, R. W. (1982). The origins and growth of action learning. Chartwell-Bratt. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb051529 Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat

Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730 Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat

Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.172.0136 Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat

Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday. Google Scholar | WorldCat

Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0223 Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat

Snowden, D. J., & Boone, M. E. (2007). A leader’s framework for decision making. Harvard Business Review, 85(11), 68–76. Google Scholar | WorldCat

Soini, K., & Dessein, J. (2016). Culture-sustainability relation: Towards a conceptual framework. Sustainability, 8(2), Article 167. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8020167 Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat

Spears, L. C. (2010). Character and servant leadership: Ten characteristics of effective, caring leaders. The Journal of Virtues & Leadership, 1(1), 25–30. Google Scholar | WorldCat

Sterman, J. D. (2012). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. McGraw-Hill Education. Google Scholar | WorldCat

Swedish Research Council. (2017). Good research practice. Vetenskapsrådet. Google Scholar | WorldCat

Waddock, S. (2020). Transformative leadership for sustainability: Developing a mindset for the future. Greenleaf Publishing. Google Scholar | WorldCat

Wahl, D. C. (2016). Designing regenerative cultures. Triarchy Press. Google Scholar | WorldCat

Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. SAGE Publications. Google Scholar | WorldCat

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. Google Scholar | WorldCat

Authors

Anette Oxenswärdh
anette.oxenswardh@angstrom.uu.se (Primary Contact)
Author Biography

Anette Oxenswärdh

Anette Oxenswärdh is a Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Industrial Engineering, specialising in Quality Science. Her research examines how professionals develop an understanding of their assignments and responsibilities, focusing on the learning processes through which mission clarity and accountability are formed, designed, and sustained throughout working life. She is particularly interested in commissioning and contracting, especially how trust, responsibility, and accountability are created and upheld within organisational structures. Her work spans key themes in quality technology—leadership, organisation, project management, process design, communication, change management, and sensemaking—and extends to applied research in the hospitality industry, where she studies the interaction between visitors and hosts as a crucial process for enhancing service quality and promoting sustainable development.

Oxenswärdh, A. (2025). Sustainability as a Living Process: Learning, Leadership and Continuous Improvement in Swedish Organisations. Sustainability Quest, 2(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.36923/SQ.v2i1.411

Article Details

How to Cite

Oxenswärdh, A. (2025). Sustainability as a Living Process: Learning, Leadership and Continuous Improvement in Swedish Organisations. Sustainability Quest, 2(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.36923/SQ.v2i1.411

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.